Fourth Street Fantasy 2012: Thoughts After the Con
As I mentioned in an earlier post, I spent the past weekend at Fourth Street Fantasy, a fantasy/science fiction (and that order does matter) conference in Minneapolis, Minnesota. While I’ve been to plenty of New York Comic-Cons and to BEA, etc. this was only my second genre con (after Readercon last year) and it was my first for both being on some panels and being able to stay for the entire event.
I had been looking forward to the con with a school kid’s mix of eagerness and trepidation. On the one hand, the program looked fascinating: panel after panel discussing thought-provoking subjects immediately relevant to my writing. On the other hand, the program was vaguely terrifying: I’d have to somehow avoid making an utter fool of myself, both on and off stage.
The Writer’s Seminar at Fourth Street
Friday morning featured an optional writer’s seminar not included in the con membership. Each of the seminar speakers gave a brief (thirty to forty-five minute) speech, discussing various facets of writing and storytelling, followed by extensive Q&A.
The presentations were interesting and entertaining, though the one-day format of the event didn’t really allow the speakers to dive deeply into a great many subjects. The two presentations that I found most interesting were Beth Meacham’s discussion of editor attitudes/processes, and Scott Lynch’s practical discussion of the reader/writer relationship. And from the latter, two of Scott’s statements particularly struck me as deserving repetition:
These are some meaty, insightful statements that might brook discussion or arguments and certainly demand exploration. They also set the tone for the rest of Fourth Street’s programming.
The Fourth Street Panels
Each of Fourth Street’s one hour panels featured a few minutes of moderator-directed questions, followed by a moderated discussion with the audience. While there was some variability, the ratio tended to be 25% moderator-generated, and 75% audience-generated questions, which made for a fast-moving, far-ranging, and insightful discussion. From conversations that I had with other attendees, this seems to be a reversal of the panel structure typical at most genre conferences; the emphasis on discussion particularly stood out for me.
The panels themselves tended to skew in the direction of theoretical/philosophical analysis of narrative structure, craft, technique, and current trends, and the exchange of ideas and opinions produced vibrant debate. Many perspectives and insights were exchanged, sometimes in stark disagreement, which left me with many concepts to think about later. Because there were only one hundred twenty or so attendees, anyone who wanted to participate could and did. This made the discussion flow more like a true conversation than a standard Q&A session, which was refreshing.
This was not only my first complete con, but also the first where I got to speak on two panels (respectively Accessibility, Genre, and Depth and Science, Technology, and Fantasy). Whether I made a fool of myself or not I shall leave to others to judge, but I know that from where I sat the conversation was stimulating, and hope that the other attendees and panelists agreed.
After each hour-long panel, Ellen Klages auctioned something off to raise money for next year’s Fourth Street Fantasy. She was engaging and funny and there was broad participation and laughs all around. The auctions made for a perfect segue to the brief coffee/bio breaks between the panels.
The Evening Revels
When the panels were all over, the discussions naturally continued into the evening. And continued into the evening means late into the evening. For me, it was a novel and wonderful experience to discuss – in detail and at depth – narrative structures, historical non-fiction, research processes, biology, and ecology, with much smarter people late into the night.
And the background folk music? Provided by an inordinately talented circle of musicians and singers? Simply amazing. The conversations eventually shifted to hilarious stories, more folk music, jokes: a bonding, entertaining, and thoroughly enjoyable way to spend the evening (PSA: should Scott Lynch ever begin a joke that involves purple ping pong balls, heed my advice and run for the hills).
The only “complaint” I could possibly voice is not really a complaint, and actually had nothing to do with the con itself. Instead, it has to do with Minnesota’s monstrous mosquitoes. Seriously, we’ve got plenty of them in NJ and since my house backs up to a swamp, I thought myself quite familiar with the little blood-suckers. But these Minnesotan vampires are more vicious than any I have ever encountered before. To give some sense of how hardcore they are, one bit my thick-skinned palm while I was slapping it out of the air. These beasts are not to be trifled with, and when I return next year, I am going to bring/buy some bug spray and bathe in it.
Final Conclusions on Fourth Street Fantasy in 2012
Overall, this was an amazing experience for me. Being able to discuss literature, history, art, culture, and fantasy with so many intelligent, erudite, and passionate people was new and energizing. All weekend long, I felt like a kid at a candy store, and I left Minnesota with new friends and many interesting ideas and thoughts floating around in my brain.
I strongly recommend Fourth Street Fantasy to anyone who is looking for in-depth and thought-provoking conversations about fantasy, literature, and culture.
Sounds like my kind of con. If I am on better footing next year I might try to attend.
You could build a heckuva panel discussion around Lynch’s second statement and get a pretty serious discussion going.
Definitely! Serious, high-level discussions of fantasy for several days straight: what’s not to like?
And to your point about how Lynch’s second statement could make a great panel in and of itself, during 4th Street (not during the writer’s seminar, unfortunately), comments/statements that could lead to great panels in-and-of-themselves were collected, and at the end of the con, the attendees voted on which idea to explore in an impromptu panel to close out the con. We ended up with a panel discussing “why divine-right kings are so popular in fantasy”.
I kept thinking, as I was there, John, that you would eat it up.
It was a pleasure to meet you, Chris, kinda, sorta, although we didn’t exchange words. 🙂
You, sir, must be a ninja. 🙂
I saw you during the panels, but somehow consistently kept missing you during the coffee breaks. Hopefully next time we’ll actually get to chat!
Thanks for the write up. This makes me even more sad that I was only able to attend the writers seminar. I’m definitely going to arrange my life so that I can do the full con next year.
I completely understand the feeling. Last year, I only got to spend one day at Readercon and was rather bummed to be missing out on the rest of the con. Fourth Street, I think, is definitely worth the weekend if you can swing it.
Sounds excellent, Chris! It’s on my list for next year – VPXV Reunion, perhaps? I will watch out for purple ping-pong ball jokes.
Ha! It might not be a bad idea: there were three VPXVers there this year, and a bunch of other VP alums from previous years, too. Reunion or not, it’ll be awesome to see you and maybe some other folks there next year!